Here I have taken some feedback from my crit in order to further develop my design. Although I now realise I am not completely happy with my design it does however fit the criteria of my brief. The images are a result of the feedback which suggested that I edit the 'image' piece to create a whole face when the poster's are views as an entire series, whilst at the same time, the pieces still work as individual poster designs;
I think this was a really effective idea, however I'm not sure if I like the aesthetic appearance or not. I fell maybe this is because I am more familiar with the previous design however, it was worth the development and experimentation opened my mind up to further design options.
Other feedback I gained in the crit session was to add colour to the images, however I have previously experimented with colours and this was (form peer feedback at the time) less effective and as a result unsuccessful. The third and final piece of feedback I gained was to create a double vision effect using the type, however I feel this would make the text 'illegible' and I have purposefully changed the angles and sizes of the text to emphasise a more 'out of sight' appearance as well as placing it in the right hand bottom corner to emphasise this also. I found all the feedback both positive and negative very useful and feel that this format and way of critiquing each others work was more useful as I gained a more honest opinion due to the crit session being completely anonymous.
